DEAR SOPHIA,

JUSTICE IS SUPPOSED TO BE BLIND. WHAT I’VE LEARNED ABOUT THE JUDGE IN MY CASE AND OPPOSING COUNSEL IS NOTABLE. THERE SEEMS TO BE SOME UNDER THE WATER RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THAT LAW FIRM AND THE JUDGE. WHAT IS ALSO NOTABLE IS THIS PARTICULAR JUDGE (AND WHEN HE WAS A LAWYER) HAS BEEN REBUKED BY THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND THE FEDERAL NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF ILLINOIS. NOW THAT HE’S A JUDGE, THE ILLINOIS COURT HAS TWICE REBUKED HIM AND EACH TIME THE CAUSE OF THE REBUKE IS DUE TO THE COURT RULING IN ERROR AND EACH TIME ERROR WAS CAUSED BY THIS SAME OPPOSING LAW FIRM IN MY CASE.

NOW THEY ARE GOING FOR THE TRIFECTA. IF TWO TIMES WASN’T ENOUGH HE WANTS A THIRD.

IT’S BAD ENOUGH WHEN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT REBUKES YOU IN A LANDMARK CASE FOR THE NATION. I AM HAPPY THAT THE SCRUTINY OF DISINFECTING DAYLIGHT IS SPOTLIGHTING THIS JUDGE AND THE LAW FIRM.

I AM STILL ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED I WILL BE VINDICATED AS THIS EXTREME INJUSTICE AGAINST ME IS FINALLY RECOGNIZED BY THE HIGHER COURT. I WILL SEE YOU SOON, SOPHIA.

143

LOVE,

DAD