DEAR SOPHIA (ET AL.)

LET ME CLARIFY WHERE THE ERRORS ARE IN THIS ARTICLE:

1. AT NO POINT WAS I EVER ACCUSED OR CHARGED OF SWINDLING ANY PARTNER, PLUS HARNACK PUT A RESTRAINING ORDER ON ME AND ON EVERY ACCOUNT PREVENTING ME FROM GIVING MY PARTNERS THEIR ASSETS. HOWEVER, THE 2011 JUDGMENT WHEN FINALLY ENTERED IN AUGUST OF 2011 GAVE ME OWNERSHIP AND POSSESSION OF EVERY ASSET AND ACCOUNT OTHER THAN THE ONE ACCOUNT BELONGING TO MY PARTNERS AT THE CBOE.
2. THE ONE PARTNER WHO HAD A DISPUTE (MINOR INTEREST IN THE SHARES) SETTLED IN THREE MONTHS ON THE TERMS I DICTATED. HARNACK REFUSED TO ALLOW THE SETTLEMENT TO BE IN EFFECT.
3. MY OTHER BUSINESS PARTNER (MAJOR HOLDER) NEVER HAD A CROSS WORD WITH ME, SUPPORTED ME THROUGHOUT THE LITIGATION AND NEVER BLAMED ME FOR ONE MOMENT FOR WHAT HARNACK HAD DONE.
4. HARNACK HAD DEPOSED ALL MY PARTNERS, HAD ALL THE BUSINESS RECORDS , INCLUDING THE TAX RETURNS AND WAS FULLY INFORMED AT ALL TIMES ABOUT THE PARTNERS’ STOCK HOLDINGS.
5. HARNACK HAD TWO LAW FIRMS IN COURT ON THE DAY SHE ENTERED THE JUDGMENT REPRESENTING HER. THE LAW FIRMS KNEW SHE WAS LYING BUT THEY WERE TRYING EVER SO HARD TO STEAL MY PARTNERS’ MONEY IN A SMASH AND GRAB TO GET THEIR LAWYERS’ FEES BECAUSE SHE REFUSES TO PAY THEM.
6. THIS IS AN IMPORTANT POINT: IN COURT, ON THE DAY SHE ENTERED THE JUDGMENT SHE SWORE UNDER OATH THAT IT WAS ACCURATE AND WAS NOT LYING. IN 2017, THE COURT FOUND THAT AT THE TIME OF THE JUDGMENT SHE KNEW OF MY PARTNERS’ ASSETS AND SHE KNEW FOR EIGHT MONTHS PRIOR THAT I HAD ALREADY RECEIVED MY SHARES OF THE STOCK AND LIQUIDATED THEM AS WAS MY RIGHT TO DO SO.
7. THEREFORE, SHE LIED UNDER OATH IN 2011 AND IS STILL LYING TODAY. WHY IS SHE LYING TODAY? BECAUSE THE MONIES I AM BEING FORCED TO ACCOUNT FOR WERE AWARDED TO ME IN 2011 BY HER OWN WRITING.

THE CONCLUSION IS, I AM BEING PUNISHED FOR HER LIES BECAUSE HER LAWYERS WANT MONEY AND SHE REFUSES TO PAY THEM FOR 15 YEARS. DON’T BELIEVE ME, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS LOOK UP THE FEE PETITIONS AGAINST HER.

286

LOVE

DAD