MR. GRIMM,

AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS NEW REPORT IN THE COOK COUNTY RECORD, MY CASE CAN BE EASILY CONDENSED AND AFTER THE STRIP AWAY THE STEREOTYPICAL TROPES, THE FACTS AND CONTRADICTIONS ARE GLARINGLY OBVIOUS. THESE FACTS AND CONTRADICTIONS RAISE SERIOUS QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ASKED:

1. WHY DID THE APPELLATE COURT IN 2022 USE THE WORD “SWINDLE” AGAINST ME WHEN IN 2017, THE SAME APPELLATE COURT AFFIRMED THAT I ONLY TOOK THE STOCK I WAS ENTITLED TO? ANSWER: to protect a white, privileged and entitled member of cook county high society.
2. AND WHY DID THE APPELLATE COURT USE THE WORD, “SWINDLE” AGAINST ME WHEN I HAD A LAWFUL AGREEMENTS WITH ALL MY BUSINESS PARTNERS THAT WERE CONFIRMED BY THEM IN 2011? answer: to protect a white, privileged and entitled member of cook county high society.
3. WHY IS HARNACK NOT PUNISHED FOR DECEIVING THE COURT MULTIPLE TIMES IN 2009-2019? ANSWER: to protect a white, privileged and entitled member of cook county high society.
4. WHY IS HARNACK NOT PUNISHED FOR PLACING A FRAUDULENT INJUNCTION AGAINST MY BUSINESS PARTNERS’ ASSETS FROM 2011 UNTIL 2017? ANSWER: to protect a white, privileged and entitled member of cook county high society.
5. WHY IS JUDGE FORTI DEFYING DECADES OF ILLINOIS CASELAW PRECEDENT IN MY CASE AND CLAIMING HE HAS UNLIMITED POWER TO HOLD ME IN JAIL INDEFINITELY AND UNLAWFULLY AND DID NOT OBEY THE ILLINOIS APPELLATE COURT’S REMAND INSTRUCTIONS? ANSWER: because he wants the powerful divorce lawyer firm to be paid millions of dollars that harnack hasn’t paid them. he has a long-standing relationship with this insider firm.
6. YOU SHOULD ASK ME, WHY DID I DEFAULT IN SEPTEMBER OF 2010? ANSWER: BECAUSE SHE LIED ABOUT MY ASSETS FROM 2008- 2011, FORCING ME TO PAY FOR HER AND MY OWN ATTORNEY’S FEES FOR YEARS AND I COULDN’T AFFORD TO PAY THEM ANYMORE. SHE NEVER PAID ONE PENNY OF ATTORNEY’S FEES.
7. WHY DID HARNACK WAIT 12 MONTHS TO ENTER A DEFAULT JUDGMENT AFTER I DEFAULTED? ANSWER: BECAUSE SHE WAS TARGETING MY PARTERS’ MONEY.
8. WHY DID HARNACK TARGET MY PARTNERS’ ASSETS KNOWING IT WAS ONLY THEIR ASSETS AND KNOWING THAT I HAD ALREADY LIQUIDATED THE STOCK I WAS ENTITLED TO? ANSWER: because she knew she had influence in the court system and thought she could get away with a smash and grab of other peoples’ assets.
9. WHY DID HARNACK AWARD ME POSSESSION OF EVERY BANK ACCOUNT AND ASSET – OTHER THAN THE ONE ACCOUNT WHICH HELD MY PARTNERS’ ASSETS? ANSWER: because she thought she could get away with lying but in 2017 the court found that she did lie and she knew she was lying. That’s perjury and you are supposed to go to jail for that.
10. WHY I AM I BEING HELD IN JAIL FOR AN OBLIGATION THAT IS NOT WRITTEN IN THE 2011 JUDGMENT? ANSWER: I SHOULDN’T BE BECAUSE IT’S NOT IN THE JUDGMENT THAT SHE WROTE.

YOU SEE, MR. GRIMM, AFTER YOU ALL YOU REMOVE THE STEREOTYPES IN A DIVORCE CASE, THE QUESTION NOW IS, WHY IS HARNACK BEING PROTECTED BY THE LEGAL SYSTEM? BECAUSE IN ANY OTHER SITUATION IF YOU TRIED TO TAKE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN OTHER PEOPLES’ ASSETS, YOU’D BE THE ONE IN JAIL AND MOST LIKELY IN FEDERAL JAIL BECAUSE THESE ARE FEDERAL CRIMES?