DEAR MR. GRIMM,

THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING COURT ON 12-2-24. THE DELAYS YOU OBSERVED WERE DUE TO THE SHERIFF AGAIN MISINFORMING THE COURT THAT I REFUSED TO COME TO COURT WHICH WAS NOT TRUE AND HAS NEVER BEEN TRUE.

THE JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT BY JUDGE SCANNICCHIO WAS EXEMPLARY OF HOW A COURT SHOULD BE CONDUCTED.

IN STARK CONTRAST, YOU OBSERVED MANY TIMES THE TEMPERAMENT OF JUDGE WEBER (AND JUDGE FORTI).

YOU ALSO OBSERVED MY TEMPERAMENT AND I BELIEVE I REMAINED POLITE, COURTEOUS AND COMPOSED IN BOTH JUDGE WEBER’S AND SCANNICCHIO’S COURT ROOMS.

I REMAINED SO EVEN AFTER JUDGE WEBER’S UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT TOWARDS ME.

I WANT TO ALERT YOU TO SOMETHING THAT OCCURRED IN COURT BEFORE JUDGE WEBER ON 12-2-24. THE SHERIFF’S OFFICER’S WERE GRANTED PERMISSION TO KEEP RECORDING IN BOTH COURTROOMS AND JUDGE WEBER RECORDED HER ZOOM FEED. THE ELECTRONIC RECORDINGS WERE IN CONTRAVENTION TO THE COURTROOM POLICIES OF NO RECORDINGS EXCEPT FOR A COURT REPORTER AND THE JUDGE RECORDING HER ZOOM. THE SHERIFF’S DEPUTIES SHOULD NEVER BEEN ALLOWED TO RECORD THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT RAISES QUESTIONS.

YOUR OBSERVATIONS AS A MEMBER OF THE MEDIA ARE ALSO A RECORD OF WHAT TOOK PLACE. I APPRECIATE THAT YOU WERE THERE TAKING COPIOUS NOTES.