ILLINOIS OWN MCBRIDE IS OUR VERY OWN ROLAND FREISLER. THERE ARE ONLY TWO EXPLANATIONS FOR HER TWISTED BEHAVIOR.

1. SHE IS COMPLETELY DERANGED
2. SHE HAS BEEN INFLUENCED

MCBRIDE’S FICTIONS ARE SO DERANGED. HERE ARE SOME OF HER FICTIONS:

I VIOLATED THE TRO. I SOMEHOW CONFUSED MY EX-WIFE. I DIDN’T DISCLOSE THE ACCOUNTS. I COMMITTED A FELONY. I ABUSED MY BUSINESS PARTNERS. I’VE CONCEALED ASSETS. THAT MY EX-WIFE DID NOTHING WRONG. THAT I HAVEN’T COMPLIED WITH SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS IN THE JUDGMENT FOR ALMOST A DECADE. THIS IS A SUMMATION OF HER DERANGED THINKING.

NOW HERE ARE THE FACTS: IRONICALLY, AS AFFIRMED BY JUDGE MCBRIDE, IN 2019:

1. MY EX-WIFE ENTERED A JUDGMENT THAT WAS ILLEGAL AND CONTRARY TO ILLINOIS LAW, AWARDING HERSELF OTHER PEOPLES’ ASSETS.
2. IN FACT, IN 2019, MCBRIDE AFFIRMED THAT MY EX-WIFE WAS AWARE THAT THESE WERE BUSINESS PARTNERS’ ASSETS, SHE HAD DEPOSED THEM, WAS AWARE OF ALL THE BUSINESS RECORDS AND STILL WROTE A JUDGMENT WRONGFULLY AWARDING HERSELF OTHER PEOPLES’ MONEY. IN ANY OTHER INSTANCE, THAT IS CALLED GRAND LARCENY.
3. SHE COULDN’T HAVE BEEN CONFUSED BECAUSE SHE HAD TWO LAWYERS REPRESENTING HER AT THE PROVE-UP IN 2011.
4. IN FACT, I NEVER COMMITTED A CRIME AND THE FALSE ACCUSATION WAS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE IN 2013.
5. THE VERY ACCOUNTS AND ASSETS MCBRIDE SCREECHES THAT I NEED TO TURN OVER WERE SPECIFICALLY ITEMIZED, LISTED AND AWARDED TO ME IN THEIR TOTALITY IN 2011. HOW DOES ONE CONCEAL WHAT ONE WAS SPECIFICALLY AWARDED IN THE JUDGMENT?
6. THERE IS NOT ONE LETTER OR PUNCTUATION MARK IN THE 2011 JUDGMENT THAT ORDERS ME TO DO WHAT MCBRIDE SAYS I HAVE BEEN RESISTANT TO DOING SINCE 2011.
7. FROM 2011 – 2019, MY EX-WIFE RUTHLESSLY PURSUED MY BUSINESS PARTNERS AND NEVER MADE ONE DEMAND UPON ME. ONLY AFTER SHE FAILED TO STEAL EVERYONE ELSE’S MONEY THE COURT THEN CHANGED THE 2011 JUDGMENT AND ENGRAFTED NEW OBLIGATIONS ON ME IN 2021 AND THEN SAYS I AM NOT IN COMPLIANCE.
8. AND AS FOR VIOLATING A TRO, EITHER MCBRIDE CAN’T READ OR THE EXPLANATION IS SOMETHING ELSE. IN OCTOBER 2009, MY EX-WIFE ASKED FOR A TRO AND IT WAS DENIED BY THE COURT – THUS GRANTING ME PERMISSION TO DO WHAT I DID. EVERY BUSINESS ACTION (WHICH MY EX-WIFE WAS FULLY AWARE OF) I TOOK WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH MY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS OR STANDARD BUSINESS PRACTICES. ONLY AFTER THOSE ACTIONS DID MY EX-WIFE OBTAIN A TRO IN FEBRUARY OF 2011 WHICH TARGETED ALL OF MY BUSINESS PARTNERS ASSETS. NO TRO WAS EVER VIOLATED. AND TO BOOT, THE 2011 JUDGMENT DISSOLVES THE TROS, AWARDS ME ALL THE ACCOUNTS WHICH MCBRIDE SAYS I’VE CONCEALED AND TAKES THE EXTRA STEP TO SAY THAT – EXCEPT FOR THE ACCOUNTS WHICH CONTAINED MY BUSINESS PARTNERS’ ASSETS AT THE CBOE – ANY CBOE STOCK ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET IS MINE TO DO WITH AS I SAW FIT.

SO, EITHER MCBRIDE IS COMPLETELY DERANGED OR…SHE HAS BEEN INFLUENCED. NOW SHE THINKS SHE IS IN THE TWILIGHT OF HER CAREER, CAN BECOME THIS ACTIVIST JUDICIAL WARRIOR. NOT SO. ALL SHE HAS DONE HAS PUT A GIANT MAGNIFYING GLASS ON HER. AND AS SO OFTEN HAPPENS WHEN YOU PUT A GIANT MAGNIFYING GLASS ON SOMETHING, A LIGHT GETS SHOWN FROM ABOVE TO ILLUMINATE. SOMETIMES WHEN YOU DO THAT, THE MAGNIFYING GLASS FOCUSES THAT LIGHT LIKE A LASER ON THE SUBJECT. (JUST ASK AN ANT WHAT THAT FEELS LIKE) MCBRIDE IS NOW BECOMING THE FOCUS OF POLITICALLY INTERESTED PARTIES AND INTENSE PUBLIC SCRUTINY.

ANYONE WHO THINKS THAT I AM GOING TO ACCEPT WHAT MCBRIDE AS DONE REALLY HAS NO CLUE. FOR 600 YEARS, MY ANCESTORS RESISTED OTTOMAN OPPRESSION AND NEVER RELENTED. MCBRIDE IS INSIGNIFICANT COMPARED TO THAT.