FOR REAL – THE WHOLE WORLD REALLY IS WATCHING THIS CASE

I AM NOW MORE AWARE THAT NOT JUST ACROSS THE UNITED STATES BUT IN THE WESTERN CIVILIZED WORLD, INTERNATIONALLY MY CASE IS BEING MONITORED WITH GREAT INTEREST. IT SEEMS THAT THE UNIVERSAL OPINION (AND THEY DO KNOW BOTH SIDES OF THE ISSUE) THAT THERE IS SOMETHING THAT REALLY STINKS ABOUT WHAT JUDGE MCBRIDE HAS DONE. I’LL MAKE IT EVEN EASIER FOR THE INTERESTED PEOPLE TO DIGEST. HERE ARE THE FACTS AND THEN HERE ARE MCBRIDE’S FICTIONS:

Harnack’s BAD ACTS

  1. A Court found that Harnack perpetrated a fraud upon the court
  2. That no TRO was in place or violated by me.
  3. That the assets she claimed at the time belonged to my business partners.
  4. That she obtained a judgment awarding herself property belonging to others.
  5. That no account or asset was concealed.
  6. That the accounts and assets now in dispute were awarded to me and were never concealed.
  7. That she had two law firms representing her and could not have been confused by anyone.
  8. That, under oath, she made statements to the court that were not accurate.
  9. That she should not benefit from her acts.
  10. That the judgment she obtained provided her with assets she was not entitled to.
  11. That she knew the assets awarded to me were in my possession.
  12. That my partners were unable to take possession of their property because of a TRO she obtained against their property.

The 2011 judgment, which she drafted, did not direct me to turn over any stock or cash to her. Instead, it directed institutions holding my partners’ stock to transfer it to her, which was found by the court to be contrary to Illinois law. The 2011 judgment also stated that any stock located anywhere other than in the account holding my partners’ assets was awarded to me.

After pursuing innocent parties through four different law firms, without paying any of them and accruing millions of dollars in unpaid fees, the 2011 “FINAL” judgment was altered in 2021 by the courts. This engraftment imposed new obligations on me, which were not part of the 2011 judgment. even though the court had found that the judgment she wrote contained an unlawful provision that could not be applied to my business partners, the court applied it to me. According to the record, this occurred while harnack maintained a trust containing millions of dollars and claimed that the trust did not permit her to use those funds to pay legal fees.

JUDGE MCBRIDE’S FICTIONS

  • That I had evaded a judgment for ten years.
  • That I caused confusion for Harnack.
  • That I injured my business partners.
  • That I committed crimes — allegations dismissed with prejudice.
  • That I violated a TRO — even though, according to the 2017 opinion affirmed by McBride, no such violation was alleged in Harnack’s arguments.

MORE TO COME. This will be updated as needed.

UPDATE, THE BEHIND-THE-SCENES SHENANIGANS BY MCBRIDE ARE ALL TOO OBVIOUS. ISSUING A MANDATE BEFORE IT’S TIME AND THEN THE CLERK SARCASTICALLY SAYING, “A JUDGE CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT,” REALLY IS LIFE IMITATING ART.

EVEN THE CURRENT PRESIDENT LIKELY SHARES MY SENTIMENT AS WELL AS MILLIONS OF FELLOW CHICAGOANS. PS SHE FOUND OUT SHE CAN’T DO WHATEVER SHE WANTS: OVER HER HEAD WE GOT THE MANDATE RECALLED.