YOU’VE GOOGLED MY NAME AND IT’S LED YOU TO THIS BLOG. THANK YOU FOR INVESTING THE TIME TO LEARN MORE. THIS SITE IS HERE BECAUSE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES FROM THE ARTICLE YOU’VE JUST READ. WHAT HAPPENED TO ME SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN TO ANYONE BUT IT CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE IN ILLINOIS BECAUSE IT’S THE CHICAGO WAY. THE LAW IN ILLINOIS SAYS YOU CAN’T DETAIN ANYONE FOR INDIRECT CIVIL CONTEMPT ONCE THE ORDER HAS EXPIRED AND THE LAW STATES THE ORDER EXPIRES IN 365 DAYS. IN OTHER STATES, ITS 6 MONTHS OR ONE YEAR MAXIMUM BY STATUTE. REMEMBER THIS IS NOT A CRIME. THIS IS A TREMENDOUS POWER THE COURT CAN EXERCISE WITHOUT ANY OVERSIGHT AND THEREFORE TO PROTECT EVERY INDIVIDUAL FROM AN ABUSIVE JUDGE THE LAW LIMITS THE DURATION OF THIS UNLIMITED POWER OF JUDGE TO DETAIN SOMEONE BASED ON JUST THE JUDGE’S OWN DISCRETION. IN MY CASE, EVERY CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARD HAS BEEN SWEPT AWAY. DISINFECTING SUNLIGHT IS REQUIRED TO PROTECT EVERY CITIZEN IN ILLINOIS FROM UNRESTRAINED JUDICIAL ABUSE IN JUST THIS KIND OF A CIRCUMSTANCE.

THANK YOU TO THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES AND REPORTER FRANK MAIN FOR HELPING ME TELL MY STORY AND FOR HELPING TO PROTECT MY DAUGHTER.

OTHERS HAVE ALSO TAKEN ON THE STORY, INCLUDING REPORTER WILLIAM J. KELLY, CWB, THE COOK COUNTY CORRECTIONS COALITION, THE COOK COUNTY RECORD, AND EVEN THE CHICAGO BAR ASSOCIATION HAS MADE INQUIRIES.

THE FOLLOWING IS NOT CURRENTLY IN THE CHICAGO SUN-TIMES ARTICLE. HOWEVER, IT MAY BE UPDATED LATER TO REFLECT THESE FACTS:

1. IN 2017, THE COURT FOUND THE JUDGEMENT OF DISSOLUTION HARNACK WROTE WAS UNLAWFUL AND CONTRARY TO ILLINOIS LAW.
2. THE COURT FOUND THAT HARNACK UNLAWFULLY AWARDED HERSELF PROPERTY BELONGING TO MY PARTNERS AND DID SO KNOWINGLY. SHE CLAIMED MY BUSINESS PARTNERS’ ASSETS WERE MINE AND SHE KNEW THEY WEREN’T.
3. NO WHERE IN THE 2011 JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION AM I ORDERED OR OBLIGATED TO TURN OVER ONE CENT OR ONE SHARE OF STOCK TO HARNACK.
4. THE ACCOUNTS THAT ARE NOW IN “DISPUTE” ARE THE ONES AWARDED TO SPECIFICALLY IN THE 2011 JUDGMENT BY HARNACK’S OWN HAND AND HER ATTORNEYS.
5. UNTIL 2021, NO CLAIM OR ORDER OF THE COURT OR ANY INSTRUCTION IN THE 2011 JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION EXISTED THAT IS CURRENTLY BEING USED TO DETAIN ME. THEY DID NOT EXIST IN 2011. THEY DO NOT EXIST TODAY AND THE COURT HAS ENGRAFTED AN OBLIGATION IN 2021 SIMPLY TO FORGIVE HARNACK’S FRAUD UPON THE COURT AS THE COURT HELD IN 2017.
6. TOM DART HAS NOW BECOME THE ENFORCEMENT ARM OF A PRIVATE DEBT COLLECTING SERVICE ADMINISTERED BY THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT. THE ONLY THING MISSING IS THE GODFATHER SOUNDTRACK.

IF THIS CAN HAPPEN TO ME, THEN IT CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE IN ILLINOIS. IT’S NOT LAWFUL BUT IT IS THE CHICAGO WAY.